|
|||
|
|
Racism in the trialMr. Alba's trial was fraught with racial overtones, directly offensive racial remarks, and calls for the use of race made by the prosecutor in securing a death sentence against Mr. Alba. From voir-dire to the closing arguments in the penalty phase, Prosecutor Goeller, made certain that the jury knew that Mr. Alba was Hispanic, and definitely not white, and that he was charged with killing a white person. During voir-dire, Mr. Goeller repeatedly and extensively placed emphasis on Mr. Alba's race:Let me see what else I want to cover real briefly.(Mr. Goeller, S.F. vol 12, pp.1583-1584). Mr. Goeller kept his promise and continued to remind prospective juror's of Mr. Alba's race in individual voir-dires. For example, during his questioning of petit juror Snapp, Mr. Goeller asked the following questions: Q. All right. We're going to talk a little bit about that.(Mr. Goeller to petit juror Snapp, S.F. vol 10, pp. 146-1148) Also during the voir-dire, Mr. Goeller's description of Mr. Alba's race often ridiculed the concept of being Hispanic: Q. Okay. That's good. One final thing. You notice by looking at the defendant -- his lawyers, at least, have indicated that he's Hispanic. All right? And I guess that's a fair statement. His last name is Alba, and he looks Hispanic, whatever Hispanic means. I don't really know what that means; but apparently he's not Caucasian. In other words, he's not white. And he's not black, and he ain't green or yellow, and he's not Oriental. So he must be Hispanic, I guess. With that in mind, do you got any special feelings one way or another against Hispanics or for them or anything like that?(Mr. Goeller, S.F. vol 14, p. 2094) He even intimated in his racial descriptions that Mr. Alba might not even be American: Q. Okay. One issue in this case certainly will be that the defendant over there is -- I guess the way the federal government calls it now is Hispanic.(Prosecutor Goeller and petit Juror Welsh, S.F. vol 1O, p.1131,). Mr. Goeller made his trial stragety perfectly clear, Mr. Alba's race would become an essential part in his attempt to garner a conviction. Prosecutor Goeller even attempted to get racist jurors onto the petit jury, and alerted biased jurors on how to answer during voir-dire, if they wanted to sit on this trial involving issues of race that he was to raise later: Interracial marriages[1]. Hispanics marrying Caucasians, or Caucasians marrying blacks, or whatever; anything like that. Some folks have feelings about that. And that's fine. That's absolutely fine. You can sit there as a juror and say, I don't believe in it. I don't like it. That's okay. It doesn't matter. As long as it would not interfere with your ability to be fair and impartial in voting these issues.(Prosecutor Goeller, S.F. vol 12, 1583-1584).[2] Prosecutor Goeller did not meet any apparently prejudiced jurors during voir-dire that he did not want to get on to the regular jury. For example, in questioning petit juror Kappus: Q. All right. How do you feel about people from different cultures who marry one another?(S.F. vol. 11, p. 1536) and juror Gray: Q. Well, I mean, some people might say, Gee, that's terrible. God never meant the races to mix. Other people might say, Hey whatever floats their boat. If those two people want to do that, no concern to me. Do you have any particular -- A. I think that's someone else's decision. I would not personally marry someone of another race.(S.F. vol, 16 p. 2682-2685), and, even juror Abadie: Q. Did you have -- did you form any general conclusion about Hispanics as a result of encountering them in the Marine Corps or otherwise?(S.F. vol 10, pp. 962-967). Even after dialog such as this, Mr. Geoller did not find reason to dismiss this juror, and fought hard to keep him on the jury panel. The greater the jurors bias towards Hispanic men and their culture the more the prosecution wanted them on the jury. Juror Hazen, although married to a black man at one time, openly expressed the likelihood that she would prejudge Mr. Alba based on her beliefs on Hispanic culture and the way they treat their women. This time prosecutor O'Connell tried to mold her answers so that she would be allowed to sit as a juror in this case. (S.F. vol 7, p.311, and pp. 311-356). Prospective jurors who did not voice racially biased comments weren't so popular with the prosecutor. For example, thje questioning of petit juror Williams by Prosecutor Haynes elicited the following response from the prosecution: Q. What's your view about people from different races or different cultures who marry each other?(S.F. vol. 15, pp.2450-2451).Mr. Snapp, who had seen some studies on the death penalty and race, had a black roommate who received the same fate. (S.F. vol 10, pp. 1143 & 1148). Although the prosecution noted with one juror the impropriety of using race as a factor in deciding this case[3], and prosecutor Goeller promised another juror that race would not be a factor in deciding the case , Goeller presented race evidence for the jury to use in their deliberations, in both the guilt and innocence and the penalty phases of the trial, and argued race as the primary basis for giving Mr. Alba the death penalty. During the penalty phase of the trial, Mr. Goeller's racial ephitets started with his own expert, Dr. Coons, asking him in a hypothetical about whether a Hispanic male, from a Hispanic culture with certain other variables was likely to be a future danger. He began his hypothetical stating,Assume, Dr. Coons, that the defendant is approximately 36 years of age, and is Hispanic; and comes from an Hispanic background. (S.F. vol 26, p. 382) (All of these charecteristics are of Mr. Alba at the time of his trial.) He continued with the "defendant's" expert, Dr. Quijano raising similar race-based testimony. In cross-examining Dr. Quijano, prosecutor Goeller brought out that the doctor in his studies of different races concluded that hispanics in general were predisposed to violence, moreso than any other race. He also stated that Hispanics were more predisposed to be recidivist, moreso than any other race. Dr. Quijano used these factors concerning Hispanics as factors to determine Mr. Alba's furture dangerousness, Texas' second special issue: Q. Okay.(S.F. vol 27, pp. 531-532, emphasis added) Q. Okay. So for those statistical factors -- and also we've got to -- we've got to consider his age, his sex, his race, his socioeconomics and employment history ... .Id at p.535: Additionally: Q. Well, the fact that the defendant's Hispanic and he's using -- calling other people wetback. Does that mean anything.Id.at 544. and further by [Haynes}: Q. So when we're talking about these statistical factors -- that more men re-offend than women, Hispanics offend more than blacks or whites, people form the low socio- economic groups, people who have opiate addiction or alcohol abuse offend more often that those who don't, people who have less education offend more often that those who have less education offend more often than those who have -- do all those things cause people to offend?Prosecutor Goeller concluded the penalty phase of the trial the way he had conducted the entire trial, by tying up his carefully placed derisions of Mr. Alba's race, his carefully elicited evidence of race and future dangerousness, with a summation that pointed out once again that Mr. Alba was Hispanic, and because Mr. Alba was a Hispanic his race should be used in answering yes to the second special issue: Now Dr. Quijano takes the witness stand, and he's published a book. He's authored an article on what to look for to help juries predict whether somebody is going to be violent or dangerous in the future. ... And I went down all the indicators. They didn't want to talk about those indicators, but I did, and I forced the issue. He's male; he's Hispanic; his age; no high school diploma; different kinds of arrest; different kinds of pools.(Prosecutor Goeller's Punishment closing SF vol.28 at 641) As a result Mr. John Alba is the only man, since Texas re-instated the death penalty after Furman, to be sent to death row from Collins county, for the killing of his wife.
[1] - This case involved the murder of a spouse in an interracial marriage. John was married to a white woman. The prosecutor also
made sure that the jury knew that John's wife was white, too (SF Vol) Q. Sir, let me make sure that you understand what is going to be asked of a juror in this case. You are never going to be asked to take into consideration the defendant's race. Okay? Do you see what I'm saying? I mean, you look over there at him. Whether he's a Mexican or Hispanic or Latino or whatever he is, it won't matter. |
||